User responsibility for review accuracy

Curia reads each contract, runs Preflight, extracts values, and drafts recommendations. The legal professional reviews those results against the contract and decides what is correct before generating the client report.

Where Curia asks you to verify

A few places in the review are designed around your judgement rather than an automatic decision. They are the points where it matters most that you confirm what Curia has produced.

Ria Findings

Where Ria has extracted or suggested a value, the field shows a Review Ria Finding card with the suggestion, the reasoning, and, where available, a link to the relevant page in the contract.

Wherever a Ria Finding appears, read it carefully and decide what the field should hold for the client. The field value may already match Ria’s finding, or it may be filled in from a related field; either way, your job is to confirm it is correct, not just to dismiss the card. Use Agree to accept the suggestion as the field value, Modify to change it before it is saved, or edit the field directly to set a different value.

Enriched dealing detail

On a title search row, an enriched dealing shows extra information Ria has pulled from the dealing document itself. The tooltip prompts you to review the detail carefully against the dealing before relying on it.

Best practices for maintaining accuracy

To ensure the highest standards of professional service:

• Always review all automated suggestions before accepting them
• Verify document references and page numbers
• Cross-check important dates, figures, and parties
• Apply your professional knowledge and experience
• Customise recommendations based on specific client needs
• Document any manual corrections or additions

Legal and regulatory compliance

Users must ensure their reviews comply with:

• Professional licensing requirements in their jurisdiction
• Industry standards and best practices
• Client engagement terms and scope of service
• Relevant consumer protection laws
• Professional indemnity insurance requirements

By understanding these responsibilities, you can leverage Curia’s powerful features while maintaining the professional standards your clients expect and deserve.

However, Curia does not:

• Replace professional judgement
• Guarantee 100% accuracy in automated analysis
• Provide legal advice
• Assume liability for review content
• Eliminate the need for professional verification

FAQ

Is Curia’s extracted data always accurate?

Curia extracted data is not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. Verify each value against the contract before finalising the review.

Who is responsible for review accuracy?

The legal professional conducting the review. Curia organises and suggests; you confirm.

Can I report extraction errors?

Yes. Use the support channels to flag recurring extraction issues so Curia can be improved.